| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ulrich Drepper <drepper(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug |
| Date: | 2002-05-25 19:55:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20020525195501.GF1617@feivel.fam-meskes.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:15:47PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> This is getting silly. Does nobody here understand that the release
Yes, but I'm not sure on which side.
> number is local for each distribution. Comparing them does not lead to
No, this is simply not true. The version number is what the upstream
gives its release. No more no less. What RH does is becoming as subtly
incompatible a possible. If that's the goal, it doesn't look like free
software for me. Sure all changes are published, but why forcing this
kind of difference between linux distributions? Why not calling it 2.2.6
or something if there has to be some changes that are not compatible?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-05-25 21:44:58 | Re: Internal flowchart |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-25 18:21:52 | Think I see a btree vacuuming bug |