| From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL general list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Wisconsin Benchmark |
| Date: | 2002-02-26 20:57:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20020226155741.P2724@mail.libertyrms.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 10:39:33AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> If you're speaking of the Wisconsin benchmark in the abstract, I think
> it's not used very much anymore; people seem to put more faith in the
> various TPC benchmark designs.
There are some explanations of why people don't like Wisconsin much
any more, and what sorts of workarounds you can use with Wisconsin in
order to address some of those worries, at
http://www.benchmarkresources.com/handbook/4.html
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M6K 3E3
+1 416 646 3304 x110
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Holger Marzen | 2002-02-26 21:11:28 | Re: Fulltext Index and Search |
| Previous Message | Zak Greant | 2002-02-26 20:30:41 | eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your organization? |