From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: JOIN between three *simple* tables ... |
Date: | 2002-02-06 21:41:17 |
Message-ID: | 20020206174041.L57607-100000@earth.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Okay, now I'm annoyed ... I *swear* I ran VACUUM ANALYZE a couple of times
since populating those tables *sigh* now its bringing up indices I'm
expecting :(
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > iwantu=# \d poc_uid
> > Index "poc_uid"
> > Column | Type
> > --------+--------
> > uid | bigint
> > btree
>
> > iwantu=# explain select count(1) from orientation_c poc where uid = 1;
> > NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
>
> > Aggregate (cost=2264.97..2264.97 rows=1 width=0)
> > -> Seq Scan on orientation_c poc (cost=0.00..2264.96 rows=1 width=0)
>
> > EXPLAIN
>
> You're forgetting ye olde constant-casting problem. You need something
> like
>
> select count(1) from orientation_c poc where uid = 1::bigint;
>
> to use an index on a bigint column.
>
> Not sure about the other thing; have you VACUUM ANALYZEd (or at least
> ANALYZEd) since filling the tables? It looks like the system thinks
> the tables are much smaller than they really are.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-02-06 22:03:20 | Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server |
Previous Message | Ian Harding | 2002-02-06 21:39:50 | Re: [Fwd: MS SQL compatible functions] |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-02-07 00:46:09 | type aliases in 7.0.3 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-06 21:14:33 | Re: JOIN between three *simple* tables ... |