Re: RC1 time?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RC1 time?
Date: 2002-01-09 20:21:04
Message-ID: 20020109161953.H15832-100000@earth.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


We're going from 512Meg -> 4GB ... most of the issues right now are swap
related ... that machine is just swapping like crazy ...

On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> As long as we're talking about overloaded resources ...
>
> The mailing list servers seem to have been horribly overloaded for a
> long time. In the past couple days it's been particularly bad (three-
> to four-hour turnaround for postings). Will these planned upgrades
> help that situation at all?
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-09 20:30:06 Re: Some architectures need "signed char" declarations
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-01-09 20:20:59 Re: again on index usage