Quick Links

Re: RC1 time?

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc:	Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: RC1 time?
Date:	2002-01-09 20:07:18
Message-ID:	14679.1010606838@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

As long as we're talking about overloaded resources ...

The mailing list servers seem to have been horribly overloaded for a
long time. In the past couple days it's been particularly bad (three-
to four-hour turnaround for postings). Will these planned upgrades
help that situation at all?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Re: RC1 time? at 2002-01-09 18:02:19 from Marc G. Fournier

Responses

Re: RC1 time? at 2002-01-09 20:21:04 from Marc G. Fournier
Re: RC1 time? at 2002-01-09 22:09:38 from Vince Vielhaber
Re: Usenet service (was: RC1 time?) at 2002-01-10 14:49:26 from Alessio Bragadini

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Tom Lane	2002-01-09 20:20:59	Re: again on index usage
Previous Message	Daniel Kalchev	2002-01-09 20:06:43	Re: again on index usage