Re: Thoughts on the location of configuration files

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Thoughts on the location of configuration files
Date: 2001-12-19 05:47:41
Message-ID: 200112190547.fBJ5lgl27042@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> > As to the security points that Tom brings up, you don't put anything in /etc
> > directly -- you put it under /etc/pgsql, and lock it down the same as$PGDATA.
>
> That'd work if we assume that /etc/pgsql can be owned by the postgres
> user. Is that kosher per the various filesystem layout standards?
> Seems to me that someone who thinks the executables should be root-owned
> is likely to think the same of the config files.
>
> Personally I think this would be a fine idea, I'm just worried that
> we'll find packagers overriding the decision because "the Debian
> standards don't allow you to do that" or whatever.

Seems the proper default location is /usr/local/pgsql/config. Anything
else and non-root people have trouble with the install.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-12-19 05:57:23 Re: Thoughts on the location of configuration files
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-12-19 05:42:45 Re: Thoughts on the location of configuration files