From: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-php(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: persistent vs. non-persistent |
Date: | 2001-10-01 22:53:11 |
Message-ID: | 20011001225313.C81032AB46@bugs.unl.edu.ar |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-php |
On Lun 01 Oct 2001 18:46, you wrote:
> > I'm having headaches with PHP, postgres and persistent connections.
>
> They never have really worked for me, but I haven't tried with the recent
> PHP->PGSQL improvements..
>
> > The problem is that my postgres backends stay alive after closing the
> > connection.
>
> That's what a persistant connection is, though... You'll have as many
> minimum PG backends hanging around as you do minimum apache backends (once
> that many PG backends get started, they hang around).
>
> > I use pg_pconnect to connect to the database, put after closing the
> > conection, nothing happens, la backend stays alive, and all I can do is
> > restart apache to make them close (really close).
> >
> > Any solution to this?
>
> Sure, don't use persistant connections..It sounds like they're the opposite
> of what you want...
I've been all day looking for solid info on this case, and what I thought is
this:
Is there a way to seek for open db connections?
I don't understand why apache (or PHP) doesn't see that it has a persistent
database connection open to use.
I'm checking the PHP PGSQL extensions at this moment.
More info later....
Saludos.... ;-)
--
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués | mmarques(at)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mitch Vincent | 2001-10-01 22:56:37 | Re: persistent vs. non-persistent |
Previous Message | Mitch Vincent | 2001-10-01 21:46:44 | Re: persistent vs. non-persistent |