Re: persistent vs. non-persistent

From: "Mitch Vincent" <mvincent(at)cablespeed(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-php(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: persistent vs. non-persistent
Date: 2001-10-01 21:46:44
Message-ID: 01a301c14ac2$908990d0$1e51000a@mitch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-php

> I'm having headaches with PHP, postgres and persistent connections.

They never have really worked for me, but I haven't tried with the recent
PHP->PGSQL improvements..

> The problem is that my postgres backends stay alive after closing the
> connection.

That's what a persistant connection is, though... You'll have as many
minimum PG backends hanging around as you do minimum apache backends (once
that many PG backends get started, they hang around).

> I use pg_pconnect to connect to the database, put after closing the
> conection, nothing happens, la backend stays alive, and all I can do is
> restart apache to make them close (really close).
>
> Any solution to this?

Sure, don't use persistant connections..It sounds like they're the opposite
of what you want...

-Mitch

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-php by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martín Marqués 2001-10-01 22:53:11 Re: persistent vs. non-persistent
Previous Message Martín Marqués 2001-10-01 21:38:17 persistent vs. non-persistent