| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net |
| Cc: | zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, barry(at)xythos(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] encoding names |
| Date: | 2001-08-24 04:21:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20010824132103U.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> > BTW, what's wrong with "encoding"? I don't think, for example EUC-JP
> > or utf-8, are character set names.
>
> Hmm, SQL talks of character sets, it has a CHARACTER_SETS view and such.
> It's slightly incorrect, I agree.
>
> Maybe we should not touch getdatabaseencoding() right now, given that the
> names we currently use are apparently almost correct anyway and
> considering the pain it creates to alter them, and instead implement the
> information schema views in the future?
I thought schema stuffs would be introduced in 7.2 but apparently it
would not happen...
--
Tatsuo Ishii
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-08-24 04:22:51 | Re: Re: OLAP, Aggregates, and order of operations |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2001-08-24 04:15:15 | Re: A couple items on TODO |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vsevolod Lobko | 2001-08-24 09:49:19 | Re: Patch for pl/tcl Tcl_ExternalToUtf and Tcl_UtfToExternal support |
| Previous Message | Robert B. Easter | 2001-08-24 01:56:10 | JDBC patch for util.Serialize and jdbc2.PreparedStatement (attempt #2) |