Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions
Date: 2001-08-07 18:26:19
Message-ID: 200108071826.f77IQJX29331@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> I'm for adding this to contrib, but is there any chance of getting it
> released under our BSD-style license, not GPL? If it's GPL then it
> will never be a candidate to move out of contrib and into the main tree,
> which seems like something we'd like to do with it eventually. The GPL
> license forbids us from merging GPL'd code into BSD-licensed code,
> so the best we can do with GPL'd code is keep it at arm's length in
> the contrib area.

One thing that made me hesistate is this. These numbers are in 1k:

93 ./doc/html
147 ./doc
58 ./examples/wkb_reader
59 ./examples
21 ./jdbc/org/postgis
22 ./jdbc/org
5 ./jdbc/examples
30 ./jdbc
136 ./loader
164 ./regress
760 .

The package is 760k. I know GIS is a major feature, but that size had
me concerned.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2001-08-07 18:40:07 Re: FW: [JDBC] BIGINT vs Java's long
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2001-08-07 18:25:52 Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-08-07 18:33:16 Re: Re: Beos Patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-08-07 18:17:48 Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions