From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
Cc: | "'Jan Wieck'" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Rule recompilation |
Date: | 2001-07-12 17:57:02 |
Message-ID: | 200107121757.f6CHv2V04751@jupiter.us.greatbridge.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mikheev, Vadim wrote:
> > Anyway, what's the preferred syntax for triggering the rule
> > recompilation? I thought about
> >
> > ALTER RULE {rulename|ALL} RECOMPILE;
> >
> > Where ALL triggers only those rules where the user actually
> > has RULE access right on a relation.
>
> In good world rules (PL functions etc) should be automatically
> marked as dirty (ie recompilation required) whenever referenced
> objects are changed.
Yepp, and it'd be possible for rules (just not right now).
But we're not in a really good world, so it'll not be
possible for PL's.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2001-07-12 18:12:14 | Re: Rule recompilation |
Previous Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2001-07-12 17:55:30 | RE: Rule recompilation |