Re: Repeated messages (was Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES)

From: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Repeated messages (was Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES)
Date: 2001-06-28 18:22:49
Message-ID: 20010628192249.H18388@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 02:00:03PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I believe its the way it currently is because hub.org has multiple mailing
> > lists, and pgsql-related ones are only a subset. Its a normal majordomo
> > behaviour to have access-control per list.
> >
> > Majordomo is a pain in the rear to modify, from what I reckon. It'd be
> > nice if all pgsql-* lists shared one allowed-poster-list, but not sure if
> > its easy to do.
>
> We do have a loopback address that allows posting to any of our lists so
> I assumed that could be used somehow.

Does it still exist? I'm sure I tried pgsql-loopback and nothing happened..

Patrick

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mihai Gheorghiu 2001-06-28 18:23:16 Exporting data from MSAccess to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2001-06-28 18:17:50 Re: Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES to accept an INCREMENT of functionname(parameters) instead of an integer