Re: Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES to accept an INCREMENT of functionname(parameters) instead of an integer

Gregory Wood wrote:
> I'm usually Mr. Features, but I don't see a whole lot of value in this one.
> I've tried to come up with a scenario that this might be useful and they're
> all contrived examples that could probably be best handled by creating my
> own system rather than forcing the functionality into the existing
> mechanism. Unless a special case were made for this type of SEQUENCE, I
> imagine that this would drastically slow them down as a whole.
>
> I'd much rather see int8 SEQUENCEs than a change in increment amounts.

I totally agree on that. IMHO a second column containing a
random number as kinda key serves alot better anyway, if you
just want to make it unguessable.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com