Re: BLOBs

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Swan <tswan(at)olemiss(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BLOBs
Date: 2001-06-11 03:15:42
Message-ID: 200106110315.f5B3FgT24983@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Thomas Swan <tswan(at)olemiss(dot)edu> writes:
> > I know that BLOBs are on the TODO list, but I had an idea.
>
> I think you just rediscovered TOAST.

We have TOAST and people want to keep large objects for performance. I
think we could us an API that allows TOAST binary access and large
object access using the same API, and hopefully an improved one.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

  • Re: BLOBs at 2001-06-12 22:19:46 from Thomas Swan

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-11 03:20:15 Re: Idea: quicker abort after loss of client connection
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-06-11 02:31:59 Re: Re: New version of contrib-intarray