| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
| Date: | 2001-06-09 22:20:32 |
| Message-ID: | 200106092220.f59MKWc05892@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
> > http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> > I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
>
> It's not approved yet ...
OK.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-09 22:30:43 | Baby girl |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-09 22:18:33 | Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2001-06-10 02:26:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-09 22:18:33 | Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |