Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Date: 2001-06-09 22:18:33
Message-ID: 19238.992125113@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
> http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

It's not approved yet ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-09 22:20:32 Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-09 22:15:54 Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-09 22:20:32 Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-09 22:15:54 Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal