Re: Standards URL's

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Standards URL's
Date: 2001-01-19 05:23:41
Message-ID: 200101190523.AAA15766@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

In one of the emails I deleted from my mailbox, the person stated they
are identical,except in price.

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Here are the URL's for the SQL standards. Where should these go? Are
> > they legal?
>
> > http://www.ansi.org
> > http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~shadow/sql/sql1992.txt
> > ftp://gatekeeper.dec.com/pub/standards/sql
> > ftp://jerry.ece.umassd.edu/isowg3/x3h2/Standards/
>
> > ANSI PDF $20
> > ISO PDF $310
>
> The document at CMU is a draft version of SQL92, which is legal to
> distribute free AFAIK (at least that's been ISO's practice with other
> draft standards). The documents at DEC are some intermediate version
> that is probably best ignored. The documents at umassd are SQL99, and
> not marked as drafts; if they are final text then they might well be
> considered pirate copies by ISO. But more likely they are late drafts.
>
> Of course, ANSI will be happy to sell you a certifiably legal copy.
>
> What I want to know is what's the difference between the "ANSI" and
> "ISO" PDF versions that ANSI sells, other than a factor of 15 in price?
> I sent an email inquiry about that to ANSI a month ago, and have not
> gotten an answer. Anyone know?
>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-01-19 05:38:04 Re: Standards URL's
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-19 05:14:22 Re: Standards URL's