Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

From: GH <grasshacker(at)over-yonder(dot)net>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: Tim Uckun <tim(at)diligence(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
Date: 2000-12-01 01:50:26
Message-ID: 20001130195026.A63801@over-yonder.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 07:58:29AM -0800, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
> At 09:44 AM 11/21/00 -0700, Tim Uckun wrote:
>
> >What about the php module? Does it take advantage of API?
>
> I don't know. If not, though, there wouldn't be much point in using
> AOLserver, since the simple and efficient database API is the main
> attraction. So I think there's a pretty good chance it does.
>

Through the course of another thread on the lists we have concluded that
PHP does not support the AOLServer (or any other similar) database API.
The "blockage" is that PHP includes its own database functions, albeit
they are based on the Postgres, MySQL, etc. APIs individually.

I am considering looking into urging an integration of PHP and
AOLServer's connection pooling (for lack of a better word) stuff.

*shrug*

gh

>
>
> - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
> Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
> http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2000-12-01 01:57:44 Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
Previous Message Tim Kientzle 2000-12-01 01:03:58 Re: Database cluster?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2000-12-01 01:55:21 Re: beta testing version
Previous Message Mitch Vincent 2000-12-01 01:37:58 Re: beta testing version