| From: | "Xavier ZIMMERMANN" <xzimmermann(at)matra-ms2i(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | 8Ko limitation |
| Date: | 2000-07-20 07:42:25 |
| Message-ID: | 200007201001.MAA05516@fwm1.matra-ms2i.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I am thinking about using postgreSQL to manage large geographic databases
connected to a GIS.
I would really appreciate if someone could give me some answers to those 3
questions :
what about performances with postgreSQL and large databases,
the object size limitation (8192 bytes) is really not acceptable for this
purpose. Is there a way or any hack to overpass it,
is the geographic index working well.
Thanks.
Xavier.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2000-07-20 07:53:30 | Re: unique constraint - bug? |
| Previous Message | anuj | 2000-07-20 07:28:49 | Return PGresult |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2000-07-20 07:53:27 | Re: Shared library search paths |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2000-07-20 06:33:33 | Re: Update: mac.c update, patch now on ftp |