| From: | eschmid+sic(at)s(dot)netic(dot)de |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Graeme Merrall <graeme(at)inetix(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Slashdot discussion |
| Date: | 2000-07-10 23:55:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20000711015549.60820@s.netic.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 08:40:27PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Graeme Merrall wrote:
>
> >
> > > Is anyone else noticing this: Everytime this sort of thing comes up a
> > > number of people invariably tell that they are using MySQL because it's
> > > easier to install, and that PostgreSQL is difficult ("a pain") to install.
> > >
> > > I've studied the MySQL installation instructions, and they don't strike me
> > > as inherently simpler. Is it only perception, or what can we do better?
> > Possibly because for most people the process is a simple './configure;
> > make; make install'
> >
> > Pgsql doesn't do this. Not the install process is any less better but
>
> huh? all i do is './configure;make;make install' ...
And what about CVS?
bash-2.01$ cd ../pgsql
bash-2.01$ cvs -z9 update -dP
cvs [update aborted]: authorization failed: server postgresql.org rejected
access
bash-2.01$
-Egon
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-07-11 00:03:53 | Re: Slashdot discussion |
| Previous Message | selkovjr | 2000-07-10 23:49:25 | Re: Slashdot discussion |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-07-10 23:56:31 | RE: AW: more corruption |
| Previous Message | selkovjr | 2000-07-10 23:49:25 | Re: Slashdot discussion |