From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tim Perdue" <tperdue(at)valinux(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: AW: more corruption |
Date: | 2000-07-10 23:56:31 |
Message-ID: | 000d01bfeaca$784144e0$2801007e@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)hub(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)hub(dot)org]On
> Behalf Of Tom Lane
>
> Tim Perdue <tperdue(at)valinux(dot)com> writes:
> >>>>>> -now hopefully I can create my indexes and be back in business
>
> > I vacuumed here and it worked. I did not use my "old" pg_log file - what
> > did I lose?
>
> Hard to tell. Any tuples that weren't already marked on disk as "known
> committed" have probably gone missing, because their originating
> transaction IDs likely won't be shown as committed in the new pg_log.
> So I'd look for missing tuples from recent transactions in the old DB.
>
Hmm,this may be more serious.
MVCC doesn't see committed(marked HEAP_XMIN_COMMITTED) but
not yet committed(t_xmin > CurrentTransactionId) tuples.
He will see them in the future.
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-07-11 00:03:53 | Re: Slashdot discussion |
Previous Message | eschmid+sic | 2000-07-10 23:55:49 | Re: Slashdot discussion |