Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jim Mercer <jim(at)reptiles(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Martin Neumann <lists(at)mne(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes
Date: 2000-01-20 22:58:47
Message-ID: 200001202258.RAA26330@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 05:18:36PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > The standard doesn't provide for specifically unsigned types, so I do not
> > > believe anyone would want to go through that trouble. Sorry.
> >
> > Actually, oid data type is an unsigned int4. If it does not behave that
> > way, it is a bug.
>
> is this just in pgsql, or in SQL in general?

Just PostgreSQL. Others don't have oids.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Schulze 2000-01-20 23:15:46 Re: < and > for datetime
Previous Message Sarah Officer 2000-01-20 22:56:24 < and > for datetime