Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes

From: Jim Mercer <jim(at)reptiles(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Martin Neumann <lists(at)mne(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes
Date: 2000-01-20 22:40:44
Message-ID: 20000120174044.D4188@reptiles.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 05:18:36PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The standard doesn't provide for specifically unsigned types, so I do not
> > believe anyone would want to go through that trouble. Sorry.
>
> Actually, oid data type is an unsigned int4. If it does not behave that
> way, it is a bug.

is this just in pgsql, or in SQL in general?

--
[ Jim Mercer jim(at)reptiles(dot)org +1 416 506-0654 ]
[ Reptilian Research -- Longer Life through Colder Blood ]
[ Don't be fooled by cheap Finnish imitations; BSD is the One True Code. ]

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-20 22:51:43 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Variable case database names
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-20 22:18:36 Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes