| From: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, jd <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |
| Date: | 2009-12-30 14:07:19 |
| Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10912300607t65e26f3ak6135b78bc4bc1936@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
<stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> wrote:
> well simply diffing the original source with ours would have answered that
> quickly :)
> Also until guillaume started working on this the upgrade scripts in
> fusionforge didn't actually work due to the fact that our version was soo
> outdated.
> I Think the main and only issue is that we never had a concerted effort
> between somebody who knows gforge/fusionforge and the sysadmin team (or the
> gforge team for that matter). I think due to the huge number of "external"
> users pgf is by far the most complex to upgrade system we have and simply
> nobody has stepped up to waste days/weeks/months worth of time yet (well I
> spend a lot of time on various migration attempts in the past which all died
> due to various reasons so I'm a bit biased).
I totally agree with the analysis of Stefan.
Apart from the delay caused by external reasons, I'm still commited to
do the ground work on the GForge/FusionForge part.
--
Guillaume
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-12-30 17:40:24 | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2009-12-30 13:02:16 | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |