Re: Update maintenance_work_mem/autovacuum_work_mem to reflect the 1GB limitation with VACUUM

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Martín Marqués <martin(dot)marques(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Update maintenance_work_mem/autovacuum_work_mem to reflect the 1GB limitation with VACUUM
Date: 2021-05-05 10:03:08
Message-ID: 1c6fa18692a77ff6098dedc0c150df24ffe9db89.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 13:48 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
> We should add a line that indicates that there is a limitation (that
> should be IMO, backported to documentation of earlier versions as it
> affects all supported versions), at least until such limitation is
> lifted.

Here is a patch for that,

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Document-the-1GB-memory-limit-for-VACUUM.patch text/x-patch 937 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-05-05 15:28:31 Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2021-05-05 09:55:20 Re: Clarify how triggers relate to transactions

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2021-05-05 10:22:34 Re: few ideas for pgbench
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2021-05-05 09:55:32 Re: few ideas for pgbench