| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Patch] Mention md5 is deprecated in postgresql.conf.sample |
| Date: | 2025-11-17 12:35:21 |
| Message-ID: | 1ACA4B4B-BDE4-477B-B242-BBA871E2DB79@yesql.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 15 Nov 2025, at 15:55, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 09:37:37AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
>> +1 to the general idea, though I think it should go the other way
>> around (it is a small enough grammatical point I'm sure some would
>> argue the other way around).
>>
>> # password_encryption = scram-sha-256 # scram-sha-256 or md5 (deprecated)
>
> I thought about that, but then wondered whether people would think the
> whole thing (password_encryption) is deprecated or maybe both
> scram-sha-256 and md5?
Sleeping on it I agree with this, and ended up applying this version.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-11-17 12:42:17 | Re: Fix a couple of misspellings in comments of logic replication |
| Previous Message | jian he | 2025-11-17 11:57:27 | Re: Running a single test |