| From: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Patch] Mention md5 is deprecated in postgresql.conf.sample |
| Date: | 2025-11-15 14:55:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20251115145538.GA10642@caipicrew.dd-dns.de;lightning.caipicrew.dd-dns.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 09:37:37AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> +1 to the general idea, though I think it should go the other way
> around (it is a small enough grammatical point I'm sure some would
> argue the other way around).
>
> # password_encryption = scram-sha-256 # scram-sha-256 or md5 (deprecated)
I thought about that, but then wondered whether people would think the
whole thing (password_encryption) is deprecated or maybe both
scram-sha-256 and md5?
> Also +1 for backpatching. IIRC this would only show up in new
> clusters, but we're still pretty early on in the cycle, so it seems
> worth it.
Yeah.
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-11-15 15:57:07 | Re: should we have a fast-path planning for OLTP starjoins? |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2025-11-15 14:37:37 | Re: [Patch] Mention md5 is deprecated in postgresql.conf.sample |