| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | postgres(at)luckynet(dot)co(dot)il (Aleksey Dashevsky) |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Subqueries? |
| Date: | 1998-09-04 14:22:48 |
| Message-ID: | 199809041422.KAA01542@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> hi, hackers!
> do you plan some improvments on subqueries?
> Unfortunately, in v6.3.2 they often works very slowly, and thus
> are useful only on quite small tables :-(
>
This is the first report of subquery slowness I have heard. We have
fixed a problem where using an oid in the subquery caused a loop, but
other than that, everything seems fine. How about sending us some
queries that are slow, and perhaps we can suggest something.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-09-04 14:28:40 | Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers] |
| Previous Message | David Hartwig | 1998-09-04 13:30:02 | Re: [HACKERS] SPARC, SunOS 5.5.1, gcc 2.7.2.1 - can't compile... |