From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com |
Cc: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] tuple return from function |
Date: | 1998-08-13 15:29:36 |
Message-ID: | 199808131529.LAA18010@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> there is a targetlist in the func node of a C function (for
> ExecMake... there is no difference between C, PL/TCL or
> PL/pgSQL), it knows that the return value is a tuple or
> tupletable or temp relation or whatever and it can manage for
> the requested projection and for the iteration (if function
> isset).
>
> But should we do that all (and the rule stuff) before 6.4?
Sorry to say this, but I think we need the rewrite stuff done for 6.4.
Too many bugs and limited features.
The PL/pgSQL perhaps can be started now, but not ready until 6.5? I
don't think we should delay 6.4 for PL/pgSQL, do you?
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dr. Michael Meskes | 1998-08-13 15:42:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Latest ecpg patch? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1998-08-13 15:26:47 | Re: [HACKERS] HELP all women were raped during the May riots in Jakarta |