From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | stuart(at)NOJUNK_ludwig(dot)ucl(dot)ac(dot)uk (Stuart Rison) |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] translate "bug"? |
Date: | 1998-07-09 04:11:32 |
Message-ID: | 199807090411.AAA06899@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> Yeah, I've rethough about it and it does seem a bit out-there ;) ... I'm
> sure there was one time where I encountered a situation where you would
> want to use the \d? commands in an SQL statement environment but I can't
> even begin to remember... so maybe it wasn't that important afterall and
> regex'ing will do just fine.
>
> I do feel though that the \df <regex> functionality would be useful in
> other catalog queries (thank james, I didn't know that what they were
> called) e.g. \do <regex> or \dt <regex> (which would get you all tables
> containing <regex> e.g. titles, tileauthors, titleditors etc, as opposed to
> \d titles which would get you just table titles).
>
> or am I being dim again? [that dreaded feeling of posting something really
> stupid...]
I think these are good ideas. I will implement them for 6.4. Glad you
are using the new features.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter T Mount | 1998-07-09 06:12:22 | Re: [INTERFACES] pb compiling JDBC interface |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-07-09 03:17:50 | Re: [GENERAL] postgresql website |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-07-09 04:41:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-07-09 03:32:35 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle |