Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL - for discussion

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL - for discussion
Date: 1998-03-12 17:40:44
Message-ID: 199803121740.MAA02751@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> Hi,
>
> as I proposed, I'm now starting on the PL/pgSQL loadable
> procedural language. As far as I'm now I have a pl_handler
> with an independent flex/bison parser that can parse a
> rudimentary implementation of the language. The next step is
> to start on the PL/pgSQL executor and look if the generated
> instruction tree can be used (up to now the pl_handler only
> dumps the instruction tree and returns a 0 Datum.
>
> If that works I'll expand the scanner/parser to the full
> PL/plSQL language including trigger procedures.
>
> But I would like to have some discussion on language itself.
> So I wrote down what I had in mind. The document is appended
> below.
>
> Please comment/suggest !

Gee, it looks really nice. I have never used such an advanced language
INSIDE a database engine.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ocie 1998-03-12 18:54:38 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables?
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1998-03-12 16:26:48 Re: [HACKERS] initdb and xpg_user