| From: | Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Permissions on copy |
| Date: | 1998-02-20 22:11:44 |
| Message-ID: | 199802202211.OAA15363@abraxas.scene.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
either-or or just a select, so it is forced to go through the
executor? If we do that, what about reload the database.. it seems
like copy should just dump the table as-is and not do funny tricks
that make it impossible to COPY FROM...
On Fri, 20 February 1998, at 12:10:29, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > Second, there was the idea of making copy allow a real select statement
> > and not just a table name. If we do that, all goes through the
> > executor, and you get view and rules working properly. May have some
> > performance penalty, though it probabably will be minor.
>
> This sounds reasonable...
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ryan Kirkpatrick | 1998-02-21 00:54:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Platform status |
| Previous Message | Humberto Rondon Parra | 1998-02-20 21:50:51 | Unsubscribe |