Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable
Date: 2021-08-31 19:07:09
Message-ID: 1966418.1630436829@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> (Starting a new thread for greater visibility)
> The attached is a fairly straightforward correction. I did want to make
> sure it was okay to bump the catversion in the PG14 branch also. I've seen
> fixes where doing that during beta was in question.

Yeah, you need to bump catversion.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2021-08-31 19:22:57 Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable
Previous Message John Naylor 2021-08-31 19:06:32 Re: RFC: Improve CPU cache locality of syscache searches