| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Date: | 2016-07-13 17:01:55 |
| Message-ID: | 19480.1468429315@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 7/12/16 7:11 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> I'm curious how it's useful and in what way \sf does not accomplish what
>> you use \df+ for.
> One main use is to see multiple related functions next to each other and
> compare their source code. But also because one is used to \df and
> wants to see everything there and not in a different format like \sf.
Well, how about my suggestion of moving source code to a footer?
I had just been experimenting to see how painful that would be, and
it doesn't seem awful --- see attached.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| show-pl-source-code-as-a-footer.patch | text/x-diff | 6.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-07-13 17:02:11 | Re: UPSERT/RETURNING -> ON CONFLICT SELECT? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-07-13 16:38:17 | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |