Re: initdb failure in CVS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: initdb failure in CVS
Date: 2004-05-06 01:17:02
Message-ID: 19334.1083806222@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Did we actually find a current system where it broke with a straight
> putenv("LC_ALL")?

Well, the Single Unix Spec does not say that that works, and neither
does the HPUX man page for putenv, so you're going to have a hard time
convincing me that it's a portable solution. I think the real story is
simply that no one has tested the C version of initdb hard enough to
notice whether that line actually accomplished anything or not.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-05-06 01:24:38 Re: COPY command - CSV files
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-05-06 00:32:12 Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?