Re: ECPGset_var

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ECPGset_var
Date: 2010-01-26 20:40:15
Message-ID: 19167.1264538415@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> Also, another "bug" is fixed in one regression test,
> it seems NaN is different across platforms, so
> we must not test for it either.

Really? The main regression tests have several test cases for NaN,
and no provision that I can see for platform dependence of the
result.

-- special inputs
SELECT 'NaN'::float8;
float8
--------
NaN
(1 row)

If ecpg isn't handling this maybe you have a real bug to deal with.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2010-01-26 20:55:22 Re: ECPGset_var
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-01-26 20:14:42 Re: ECPGset_var