Re: bootstrap pg_shseclabel in relcache initialization

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bootstrap pg_shseclabel in relcache initialization
Date: 2015-11-10 05:28:54
Message-ID: 19162.1447133334@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydata(dot)com> writes:
>>> Need to bump this #define? If you didn't get the error that this is
>>> supposed to throw, perhaps there's a bug somewhere worth investigating.

> Whoops! It must be getting late... updated patch attached.

I'm with Alvaro: the most interesting question here is why that mistake
did not blow up on you immediately. I thought we had enough safeguards
in place to catch this type of error.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2015-11-10 05:44:23 Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Previous Message Adam Brightwell 2015-11-10 05:15:10 Re: bootstrap pg_shseclabel in relcache initialization