[PATCH v1] Reject zero resource kinds in test_resowner_many()

From: Grigorev Jurij <ju(dot)grigorev(at)ftdata(dot)ru>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] Reject zero resource kinds in test_resowner_many()
Date: 2026-09-11 08:51:30
Message-ID: 1905e9d709554733b418d06a4806436f@localhost.localdomain
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi hackers,

While running Clang Static Analyzer through CodeChecker over PostgreSQL
18.6, we found a possible division by zero in
RememberManyTestResources():

kind_idx = (kind_idx + 1) % nkinds;

The SQL entry point rejects negative values of nkinds but accepts zero.
If there are resources to remember, the helper then accesses kinds[0]
even though the array contains no resource kinds, and can eventually
reach the modulo operation.

For example:

CREATE EXTENSION test_resowner;
SELECT test_resowner_many(0, 1, 0, 0, 0);

On an assertion-enabled master build on macOS, I get:

NOTICE: remembering 1 before-locks resources
TRAP: failed Assert("kind->release_phase != 0"),
File: "../src/backend/utils/resowner/resowner.c", Line: 536
LOG: client backend was terminated by signal 6: Abort trap: 6

ResourceOwnerRemember() detects the invalid descriptor passed as
&kinds[0].desc, so this build fails before reaching the division.

The after-locks path has the same problem:

SELECT test_resowner_many(0, 0, 0, 1, 0);

Interestingly, in the same build this failed the neighboring assertion:

TRAP: failed Assert("kind->release_priority != 0"),
File: "../src/backend/utils/resowner/resowner.c", Line: 537

The two calls fail at different checks depending on the contents of the
invalid kinds[0] entry. Without assertions, the code has already
invoked undefined behavior before reaching the modulo, so the exact
failure mode is not predictable.

ForgetManyTestResources() contains another "% nkinds", but that
expression is inside a loop bounded by nkinds. With nkinds equal to
zero, the loop body is never entered, so only the remember path needs
fixing.

The patch rejects nkinds <= 0 at the SQL entry point, matching
test_resowner_priorities() in the same module. It also adds an
assertion documenting the helper's precondition and regression coverage
for both remember paths.

This deliberately changes the behavior of the all-zero invocation:

SELECT test_resowner_many(0, 0, 0, 0, 0);

It currently succeeds as a no-op, but with the patch it returns:

ERROR: nkinds must be greater than zero

I think rejecting it is preferable because zero resource kinds do not
have a useful meaning for this test. Would it be better to preserve
the all-zero no-op case and reject nkinds = 0 only when resources are
requested?

The issue was introduced with the test_resowner module in commit
b8bff07daa85, so PostgreSQL 17, PostgreSQL 18, and master are affected.
It is confined to the test module; production ResourceOwner code is not
affected.

The patch applies cleanly to current master. I reproduced both failures
without the patch and verified that the test_resowner regression test
passes with it applied.

I would also appreciate opinions on whether this test-only fix is worth
back-patching to PostgreSQL 17 and 18. I can prepare separate
back-branch patches if needed.

I will add the patch to the CommitFest.

Best regards,
Yuriy Grigoryev

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Reject-zero-resource-kinds-in-test_resowner_many.patch application/octet-stream 3.2 KB

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2026-09-11 08:52:27 Re: Revert RI fast-path batching from REL_19_STABLE
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2026-09-11 08:47:22 Re: Fix failing assert in deferred constraint trigger