Re: TESTING (was: RE: More vacuum.c refactoring )

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Cc: "Manfred Koizar" <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TESTING (was: RE: More vacuum.c refactoring )
Date: 2004-06-11 22:05:31
Message-ID: 19017.1086991531@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> writes:
>> It was done and we fixed a couple of bugs based on it (the
>> one I can think of offhand had to do with semantics of
>> aggregate functions in sub-selects). I don't think there's
>> anything more to be learned there.

> It is reassuring to know that it passed with flying colors.

"Passed with flying colors" might be overstating it --- but the other
things it found were stuff we already knew about, eg, unimplemented
features, identifier case folding, that kind of thing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-06-11 22:14:55 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Tablespaces
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2004-06-11 22:01:52 Re: Compiling libpq with VisualC