Re: Code of Conduct plan

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeremy Schneider <schnjere(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct plan
Date: 2018-06-06 18:22:49
Message-ID: 18354.1528309369@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

I wrote:
> Yeah, somebody else made a similar point upthread. I guess we felt that
> the proper procedure was obvious given the structure, but maybe not.
> I could support adding text to clarify this, perhaps along the line of

Hmm ... actually, there's another special case that's not discussed,
which is what happens if a committee or core member wants to file a
complaint against someone else? They certainly shouldn't get to rule
on their own complaint. So maybe change "complaint against" to
"complaint by or against" in my proposed addition, and then we're good.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2018-06-06 18:24:14 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-06-06 18:09:22 Re: Code of Conduct plan

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2018-06-06 18:24:14 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Jeremy Finzel 2018-06-06 18:17:01 Re: Slow planning time for simple query

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2018-06-06 18:24:14 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-06-06 18:16:23 Re: I'd like to discuss scaleout at PGCon

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2018-06-06 18:24:14 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-06-06 18:09:22 Re: Code of Conduct plan