| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | DeJuan Jackson <djackson(at)speedfc(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] INSTEAD rule bug? |
| Date: | 2003-07-22 19:35:27 |
| Message-ID: | 18060.1058902527@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> What does the code do now after you changed it? Fail on the UNION
> query?
Yeah. You get something about "union can't be conditionally executed"
(I forget the exact wording, but it's comparable to what we say about
NOTIFY under similar circumstances).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-07-22 20:39:28 | Re: PostgreSQL 7.3.3 with pgcrypto on FreeBSD 5.1 |
| Previous Message | Boris Folgmann | 2003-07-22 16:04:05 | Bugzilla? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vincent Hikida | 2003-07-22 19:54:08 | Re: comparing database schema's |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-07-22 19:24:26 | Re: New Poll @ Codewalkers |