Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
Date: 2022-04-15 21:51:26
Message-ID: 1802041.1650059486@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On April 15, 2022 2:14:47 PM EDT, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I could use some help filling in the XXX comments, because it's far
>> from clear to me *why* walsenders need this to happen.

> If you want to commit before: The reason is that walsenders use their xmin to represent the xmin of standbys when using hot_standby_feedback. Since we're only transmitting global horizons up from standbys, it has to influence globally (and it would be hard to represent per db horizons anyway).

Got it. I rewrote the comments and pushed. Noah, it should be safe
to turn wrasse back on.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sahil Harpal 2022-04-15 22:36:27 GSOC-2022 | Improve pgarchives proposal review
Previous Message Ilaria Battiston 2022-04-15 20:40:42 Re: [GSOC-22] Proposal Review