Re: pg_dump --with-* options

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --with-* options
Date: 2025-06-13 00:33:26
Message-ID: 17a34727-51be-4973-b5e1-2d2ec52dd30c@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025/06/13 6:12, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-06-12 at 15:57 -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> FWIW I don't have a tremendously strong opinion about --statistics-
>> only.
>
> Same here. I won't cast a vote on this particular issue, as long as the
> functionality is available.

I prefer keeping it as a shorthand for --with-statistics --no-data --no-schema.
It's redundant, but it's intuitive and convenient. That said, if others feel
strongly about removing it, I'm fine with that too.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA Japan Corporation

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2025-06-13 00:39:54 Re: pg_dump --with-* options
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-06-13 00:13:08 Re: Replace some %llu remnants in the tree