| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Karina Litskevich <litskevichkarina(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Implicit conversion from int64 to int32 when calling hash_get_num_entries |
| Date: | 2026-07-31 20:07:04 |
| Message-ID: | 1792081.1785528424@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> On 31 Jul 2026, at 16:14, Karina Litskevich <litskevichkarina(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure how CFBot works. It's failing to apply the patch, and
>> I believe it's because I sent two alternative patches in one mail.
>> So I'm resending one patch this time, hoping it will work.
> The CFBot will try to apply all the patches in the mail as a patchset, so your
> suspicion was correct. It's green in the CFBot now.
For future reference, you can prevent the bot from applying
"alternative" patches by naming your attachments properly.
A common choice is to append ".nocfbot" to the name of any
attachment you want the bot to ignore. More info here:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Cfbot#Which_attachments_are_considered_to_be_patches?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sami Imseih | 2026-07-31 20:08:53 | Re: pgstat: Flush some statistics within running transactions, take 2 |
| Previous Message | Vladlen Popolitov | 2026-07-31 19:54:02 | Re: [PATCH v1] add SQL type INT16 based on int128 |