Re: [PATCHES] log session end - again

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] log session end - again
Date: 2004-02-03 14:49:16
Message-ID: 17606.1075819756@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I'm not sure I understand. I didn't suggest that a sequence should be
> used for txn ids. For the purpose I had in mind we would call nextval()
> once per connection,

Oh, okay, I misunderstood. But why not just use the PID?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcio Caetano 2004-02-03 14:56:11 Multicolumn Indexing using R-Tree
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2004-02-03 14:18:10 Re: session IDs

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-02-03 15:47:59 Re: session IDs
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2004-02-03 14:18:10 Re: session IDs