Re: [PATCHES] log session end - again

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] log session end - again
Date: 2004-02-03 16:29:05
Message-ID: 1736.24.211.141.25.1075825745.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane said:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> I'm not sure I understand. I didn't suggest that a sequence should be
>> used for txn ids. For the purpose I had in mind we would call
>> nextval() once per connection,
>
> Oh, okay, I misunderstood. But why not just use the PID?
>

Bruce and others have suggested that PID is not sufficiently unique.
Personally, I can live with it :-)

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-03 16:32:38 Re: pg_restore bug in 7.4.1 ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-02-03 16:26:03 Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2004-02-03 16:33:51 Re: session IDs
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-03 16:26:34 Re: fix memcpy() overlap