Re: Missing LWLock protection in pgstat_reset_replslot()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Missing LWLock protection in pgstat_reset_replslot()
Date: 2024-04-02 19:18:24
Message-ID: 1732271.1712085504@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 07:46:26PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Sounds good to me.

> I've applied the patch of this thread as b36fbd9f8da1, though I did
> not see a huge point in backpatching as at the end this is just a
> consistency improvement.

I've closed the CF entry for this [1] as committed. Please re-open
it if there was something left to do here.

regards, tom lane

[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/47/4878/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2024-04-02 19:38:10 Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-04-02 19:04:54 Re: BUG: deadlock between autovacuum worker and client backend during removal of orphan temp tables with sequences