Re: different catalogue version numbers?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Sullivan <sullivana(at)bpl(dot)on(dot)ca>
Cc: user Postgresql ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: different catalogue version numbers?
Date: 2000-06-02 22:26:44
Message-ID: 17156.959984804@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Andrew Sullivan <sullivana(at)bpl(dot)on(dot)ca> writes:
> 000602.17:24:31.217 [5066] FATAL 2: database was initialized with
> CATALOG_VERSION_NO 200003141,
> but the backend was compiled with CATALOG_VERSION_NO 200005041.
> looks like you need to initdb.

Yup, that's a check that was added in hopes of improving over the old
crash-and-burn behavior when you tried to run a backend with an
incompatible database...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-06-02 23:47:53 Re: [HACKERS] Oft Ask: How to contribute to PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2000-06-02 21:16:29 different catalogue version numbers?