Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?

From: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?
Date: 2006-04-21 22:01:19
Message-ID: 16A7A854-53D8-4431-B41D-33C56E046643@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Apr 21, 2006, at 13:54, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
>
> It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
> and approves it.

Cool, thanks Bruce.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Hamill 2006-04-21 22:09:42 Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-04-21 21:57:07 Re: plperl on AIX

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-04-21 23:11:09 Re: [PERFORM] WAL logging of SELECT ... INTO command
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-21 20:54:43 Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?