Re: Bad optimizer data for xml (WAS: xml data type implications of no =)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bad optimizer data for xml (WAS: xml data type implications of no =)
Date: 2010-06-09 05:14:56
Message-ID: 16827.1276060496@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It's possible. I don't really see a reason not to add an = operator
> for XML - does anyone else?

Yes, that was considered and rejected, IIRC. What is your definition
of equality for xml?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sachin Srivastava 2010-06-09 05:33:28 Re: BUG #5475: Problem during Instalation
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2010-06-09 03:58:41 Re: BUG #5475: Problem during Instalation